University of Arkansas at Monticello Admissions

College of Arkansas at Monticello Admissions College of Arkansas at Monticello Admissions Overview: The University of Arkansas at Monticello has open confirmations, implying that every single intrigued understudy get the opportunity to concentrate there in the event that they fulfill least application guidelines. Those keen on going to should present an application, secondary school transcripts, and scores from the SAT or ACT. Confirmations Data (2016): College of Arkansas at Monticello Acceptance Rate: - University of Arkansas at Monticello has open admissionsTest Scores 25th/75th PercentileSAT Critical Reading: -/ - SAT Math: -/ - SAT Writing: -/ - Whats a decent SAT score?Compare SAT scores for Arkansas collegesACT Composite: -/ - ACT English: -/ - ACT Math: -/ - Whats a decent ACT score?Compare ACT scores for Arkansas schools College of Arkansas at Monticello Description: Established in 1909, the University of Arkansas at Monticello is an open, four-year organization situated in Monticello, Arkansas. Little Rock is around 90 miles toward the north. The school has little branch grounds at Crossett and McGehee. The college offers a wide scope of scholarly projects at the partner, lone rangers, and bosses degree levels, just as around 30 expert confirmations. Scholastics are bolstered by a 17/1 understudy/staff proportion, and the school invests wholeheartedly in the individual consideration understudies get. The schools appealing grounds incorporates a lake, ranch land, and woods. Truth be told, UAM has accomplished Tree Campus USA status consistently since 2010, and the college is glad for the primary campuss 1,433 trees speaking to 80 unique species. UAM has the main School of Forestry in Arkansas, and over a thousand sections of land of the schools 1,600-section of land grounds are woods land utilized for research and guidance. Games are famous at UA M. Intramural games incorporate racquetball, bowling, billiards, wallyball, volleyball, and dodgeball. On the intercollegiate front, the UAM Weevils contend in the NCAA Division II Great American Conference. Enlistment (2015): Complete Enrollment: 3,643â (3,428 undergraduates)Gender Breakdown: 43% Male/57% Female62% Full-time Costs (2016â -17): Educational cost and Fees: $7,210â (in-state); $13,060 (out-of-state)Books: $1,200 (why so much?)Room and Board: $6,338Other Expenses: $3,600Total Cost: $18,348â (in-state); $24,198 (out-of-state) College of Arkansas at Monticello Financial Aid (2015â -16): Level of New Students Receiving Aid: 97%Percentage of New Students Receiving Types of AidGrants: 95%Loans: 60%Average Amount of AidGrants: $7,649Loans: $5,168 Scholastic Programs: Most Popular Majors: Agriculture, Business Administration, Criminal Justice, General Studies, Health and Physical Education, P-4 Early Childhood Education Move, Graduation and Retention Rates: First Year Student Retention (full-time understudies): 52%Transfer Out Rate: 20%4-Year Graduation Rate: 12%6-Year Graduation Rate: 18% Intercollegiate Athletic Programs: Mens Sports: Football, Basketball, Baseball, Track and Field, Golf, Cross CountryWomens Sports: Basketball, Golf, Softball, Track and Field, Volleyball, Cross Country Information Source: National Center for Educational Statistics In the event that You Like University of Arkansas at Monticello, You May Also Like These Schools: Arkansas Tech UniversityHenderson State UniversityUniversity of Arkansas at Little RockUniversity of Central Arkansas (UCA)University of Arkansas at Fort SmithUniversity of Arkansas at FayettevilleHarding UniversityLyon CollegeHendrix CollegeGrambling State University

Mind or Body Philosophy Paper

Alexandra Williams Philosophy 1100 The Mind as well as Body Argument For a huge number of years rationalists have recognized a limit between or physical selves and our psychological selves. Anyway with the progression of time and the headways of science whether we are represented by our psyches or simply our bodies has been discussed to an ever increasing extent. There are a long queue of antiquated masterminds who considered the brain body relationship issue beginning with Plato and Aristotle (Waller, 2011). Without realizing what we are controlled by we can never genuinely arrive at our maximum capacity since we might be restricted by our physical or mental selves.The brain or body contention comprises of contentions for the presence of just the psyche, the body, and a mix of the two. Numerous savants put confidence in the possibility that our bodies are discrete substances than our brains. Since they are sure beyond a shadow of a doubt that we do think they believe they can be cer tain that we are our psyches. Bodies simply happen to be our stays and we can doubtlessly live without them. Rene Descartes once expressed â€Å"I exist as a reasoning thing. What at that point is it that I am? A reasoning thing. What is a reasoning thing?Is it a thing that questions, comprehends, asserts, denies, wills, avoids willing, that additionally can know about pictures and sensations? †¦ It is sure that I am genuinely particular from my body, and I can exist without it. † (Dr. Weave Zunjic, University of Rhode Island). The possibility of our reality genuinely being just our personalities we could leave our own bodies and without expecting to take care of our bodies or be burdened by the delicacy of them who realizes to what extent we could live or the amount we could learn?While realist accept that everything is made of issue Aristotle had a contention against this â€Å"if the insight were material then it couldn't get the entirety of the structures. On the of f chance that the mind were a particular material organ (or part of one) at that point it is limited to getting just specific sorts of data, as the eye is confined to accepting visual information and the ear is limited to accepting sound-related information. Since the keenness is fit for getting and considering all types of information, at that point it must not be a physical organ and, consequently, it must be immaterial† (Waller, 2011).While numerous rationalists accept that the brain is a definitive force house others accept that the body is. Throughout the previous hundred years or so realism has been the prevailing hypothesis in mysticism. With the quick advances of science the thoughts that our reality is just physical have been increasingly unmistakable. Realism or physicalism is the possibility that everything that exists is not any more broad than it’s physical properties, implying that there is nothing that exists that isn’t tangible.Because researchers have had the option to clarify things that many accounted to crafted by a higher force before many have come to accept that presence is less complex to clarify than it was already. The possibility of Ockham’s razor is utilized to contend against contentions of the psyche. Ockham’s razor fundamentally says that straightforward clarifications are ordinarily the best (Waller,2011). Why attempt to contend that God made the planets circle the earth with no confirmation when it is simpler to state and demonstrate that all planets rotate around the sun? Realists accept that we must make certain of the things that we can contact or see so there is just a single substance on the planet: matter.Many individuals have an issue with realism and the contention of body over psyche anyway in light of the fact that it prompts moral issues. In the event that the main things that exist are physical, things that we can see, contact, and so on then by what means can there be religion? We can't see God in this manner, in a materialist’s sentiment, he can't exist. There are clearly logicians that have faith in both brain without anyone else or matter without anyone else, however there are the individuals who put stock in a blend of the two too. While a few scholars decide to accept that either the psyche or the body is better than the other numerous logicians accept that both brain and body are what we are made of.According to Bertrand Russell â€Å"the stuff of which the universe of our experience is created is, in my conviction, neither brain nor matter, yet something more crude than either. Both brain and matter appear to be composite, and the stuff of which they are aggravated lies one might say between the two, it could be said above them both, similar to a typical precursor. † (The Analysis of Mind, 1921) To logicians who accept this, creatures are a blend of their physical and mental activities and abilities.Rene Descartes is firmly connected with the possibility of dualism, which is the possibility that psychological events are non-physical and that the brain and the body are unmistakable. He connected the psyche with cognizance and mindfulness and separated it from the physical cerebrum of an individual. Descartes is known as the principal scholar to take note of the distinction between the brain and body. Dualists come to their meaningful conclusions with so much models as when they body is harmed it makes torment the psyche and that on occasion, in any event, when they body is harmed the brain defers torment as shock.If the body or the brain just existed without anyone else then we wouldn’t feel torment on the grounds that it’s a physical activity with a psychological reaction. You need both in the condition to get torment as the outcome. Dualism additionally has a preferred position since it is reliable with our encounters. At the point when we have thoughts or sentiments we don’t consider them in i deas of size, weight, shading, shaper, and so on. We consider them as far as great, terrible, insightful, youthful, or something else. It likewise clarifies certain things like human capacities. Things like the thoughts of opportunity, profound quality, morals, and different things that make us perceivably human.Now on dualism, Descartes proposed a hypothesis called interactionism, accepting that the body and the psyche had a real point where one started and the other finished. He trusted it to be the place the pineal organ is on the grounds that at the time they didn’t comprehend what it did. Anyway with the clarification of the pineal gland’s genuine reason came the removal of interactionism (Waller, 2011). Additionally dualism went under distrust as a result of it’s propensity to be a more perplexing clarification of things than was required. Magical issues, for example, the psyche or body contest are one of the most discussed subjects in the philosophical wo rld.So numerous extraordinary personalities have been puzzled by this issue. To mark presence as absolutely physical methods the excusal of the possibility of a higher force. To state that life is simply mental neglects to clarify how fundamentally various real factors collaborate, for example, sensations like torment. Indeed, even the possibility that both cooperate together can be tested in light of the fact that it is extremely unlikely to completely clarify how the two interface and are converted into one another. Tragically this is an inquiry improbable to have an answer ever, or possibly no time in the close future.This can nearly be terrifying in light of the fact that until we have a response to these requests we won’t have the option to really know ourselves or the things around us. In concurrence with Thomas Nagel †What is required is something we don't have: a hypothesis of cognizant creatures as physical frameworks made out of substance components and consum ing space, which likewise have an individual point of view on the world, and now and again a limit with regards to mindfulness also. Here and there that we don't presently comprehend, our brains just as our bodies appear when these materials are appropriately consolidated and organized.The bizarre truth is by all accounts that specific complex, naturally produced physical frameworks, of which every one of us is a model, have rich non-physical properties. A coordinated hypothesis of reality must record for this, and I accept that if and when it shows up, most likely not for quite a long time, it will modify our origination of the universe as fundamentally as anything needs to date. †(The View From Nowhere, 1989). Works Cited Nagel, Thomas. The View From Nowhere. N. p. : n. p. , 1989. Print. Waller, Bruce N. Think about Philosophy. N. p. : n. p. , n. d. , 2011. Print. Zunjic, Bob. College of Rhode Island. N. p. , n. d. Web. 24 Apr. 2012.

Why Personal Experience Essay Topics May Not Be a Good Choice

Why Personal Experience Essay Topics May Not Be a Good ChoiceAs you study how to write a personal experience essay, you may find that you are overwhelmed by the many different choices you have. The truth is that while the personal is of course very personal, you need to consider a wide variety of factors before you can come up with an essay topic that is truly unique. Of course, the key is to be willing to try new things and not to be afraid to try something that may prove unhelpful in the end.Writing about your life is difficult, but writing about it in a way that is personal can be much more difficult. The good news is that there are many great personal essay topics that you can choose from. Of course, most of these topics require that you write an essay that is both interesting and compelling. It is also important that you have a variety of experiences to include in your essay, as only then will you be able to bring to light what you feel is the real you.A difficult essay topic ca n be one that is very personal, or it can be one that is highly academic. There are plenty of opportunities for writing about your life, including a personal blog that you have been writing for years. If you have a lot of personal information about yourself, you can even go so far as to write about your life online.However, if you are more inclined to write about a more intellectual subject, you should consider having an essay on your life experience as a writer. These types of essays are written based on topics that are considered 'popular' in today's college classrooms. Essays that deal with writing topics such as successful writing, how to succeed as a writer, or how to write a story with characters who are interesting and endearing are all excellent choices for essay topics.Just like any other subject, the truth is that the experience of writing is difficult. Unfortunately, it is also true that writers are often at a disadvantage when writing assignments that require them to use their experience as a teacher or other authority figure. You should still try to use your experience as a writer, but you should do so in a way that is effective.Remember that when you use your experience as a writer, you are likely to sound more like a professional than you would if you did not include your own experiences. Because of this, it is probably a good idea to make sure that you include at least some of your own experiences in your essay. Remember that when it comes to a more academic writing assignment, you should try to keep to topics that are familiar to you, such as how to succeed as a writer. This is an excellent way to avoid sounding like a teacher who is trying to teach something to you.Another thing to keep in mind is that you should really try to express yourself as clearly as possible in your essay. There is no reason why you should include your entire life experience in an essay that is more than 300 words long. Keep in mind that many students are less likely to get through an essay if they do not get a good grasp of the main ideas that you are trying to convey in the essay.Most of all, remember that if you do not show how you came to write about your own life, you may find that you do not get all of the credit that you should. Try to keep all of your life experiences to a minimum, especially if you do not want to emphasize yourself. Just keep in mind that your experiences as a writer will only be relevant if you use them to help illustrate an idea or to further your message in your essay.

Solubility Definition in Chemistry

Solubility is defined as  the maximum quantity of a substance that may be dissolved in another. It is the maximum amount of solute that may be dissolved in a solvent  at equilibrium, which produces a saturated solution. When certain conditions are met, additional solute may be dissolved beyond the equilibrium solubility point, which produces a supersaturated solution. Beyond saturation or supersaturation, adding more solute does not increase the concentration of the solution. Instead, the excess solute starts to precipitate out of solution.​ The process of dissolving is termed dissolution. Solubility is not the same property of matter as the rate of solution, which describes how quickly a solute dissolves in a solvent. Neither is solubility the same as the ability of a substance to dissolve another as a result of a chemical reaction. For example, zinc metal dissolves in hydrochloric acid through a displacement reaction that results in zinc ions in solution and the release of hydrogen gas. Zinc ions are soluble in acid. The reaction is not a matter of the solubility of zinc. In familiar cases, a solute is a solid (e.g., sugar, salt) and a solvent is a liquid (e.g., water, chloroform), but the solute or solvent may be a gas, liquid, or solid. The solvent may either be a pure substance or a mixture. The term insoluble implies a solute is poorly soluble in a solvent. In very few cases is it true no solute dissolves. Generally, an insoluble solute still dissolves a little. While there is no hard-and-fast limit that defines a substance as insoluble, its common to apply a threshold where a solute is insoluble is less than 0.1 gram dissolves per 100 milliliters of solvent. Miscibility and Solubility If a substance is soluble at all proportions in a specific solvent, it is called miscible in it or possesses the property called miscibility. For example, ethanol and water are completely miscible with each other. On the other hand, oil and water do not mix or dissolve in each other. Oil and water are considered to be immiscible. Solubility in Action How a solute dissolves depends on the types of chemical bonds in the solute and solvent. For example, when ethanol dissolves in water, it maintains its molecular identity as ethanol, but new hydrogen bonds form between ethanol and water molecules. For this reason, mixing ethanol and water produces a solution with a smaller volume than you would get from adding together the starting volumes of ethanol and water. When sodium chloride (NaCl) or other ionic compound dissolves in water, the compound dissociates into its ions. The ions become solvated or surrounded by a layer of water molecules. Solubility involves dynamic equilibrium, involving opposing processes of precipitation and dissolution. Equilibrium is reached when these processes occur at a constant rate. Units of Solubility Solubility charts and tables list the solubility of various compounds, solvents, temperature, and other conditions. The IUPAC defines solubility in terms of a proportion of solute to solvent. Allowable units of concentration include molarity, molality, mass per volume, mole ratio, mole fraction, and so on. Factors That Affect Solubility Solubility may be influenced by the presence of other chemical species in a solution, the phases of the solute and solvent, temperature, pressure, solute particle size, and polarity.

Feminism Of Hip Hop And Rap Music - 1504 Words

Introduction: Hip Hop or Rap music is often related to themes of misogyny and objectification towards women (Weitzer and Kubrin 2009 ; Gourdine and Lemmons 2011). Ruby M. Gourdine and Brianna P. Lemmons specifically state that misogynistic themes began to gain prominence in the genre during the late 1980s. I would suggest that the prevalence of objectification and misogyny in hip hop could pose a threat to a positive self image for females, exposed to this form of media. What is objectification? The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines objectification, as â€Å"the seeing and/or treating a person, usually a woman, as an object(Papadaki, 2015). Rae Langton asserts two key aspects to feminist objectification theory which I believe†¦show more content†¦Both Minaj and Azalea are highly influential figures as a result of their success, within pop culture, and therefore the contents of the media they produce should have an impact on those which consume their work. Selection and Justification for Medium Of Analysis: For my analysis I specifically chose to investigate the top three most popular music videos from both Nicki Minaj and Iggy Azalea. I determined there popularity based on the number of views the official videos had on their respective Youtube Vevo Channels. Popularity of the videos was an important factor as this content would seemingly have the most far reaching impact, as a result of the scale of viewers. Further, I avoided selecting videos based on their direct relevance to my research question as doing so could impact the validity of my findings negatively, as videos choosen based on relevance could be influenced by preconceptual biases. Overall, music videos were selected as the medium of analyzation as videos are a visual representation of the topics and themes of a given song. In addition, music videos can provide a broadened and enriched creative concept in tangent with the original purely sonic form of the media. Methodology and Research Question: The content was analyzed through the following process; first watching the videos and making note of the number of times a male was portrayed in aShow MoreRelatedBlack Feminism s Speech At The Ohio Women s Rights Convention Essay1442 Words   |  6 Pagesfeminist everywhere can follow behind. Feminism is simply the advocacy of equality of sexes social, political, and economic, but until this can happen you have to address race and class oppression among other inequalities. This is the reason why the idea of black feminism was introduced. Coined by Kimberlà © Crenshaw in 1989, black feminism argues that the experience of being a black woman cannot be understood in terms of being black or of being a woman. Black feminism became popular in the 1960s, in responseRead MoreWomen And Hip Hop Culture1275 Words   |  6 PagesWomen have always played a major role in the hip hop culture. This can be seen when watching music videos, or listening to female rappers. Women are simply involved in everything. However, that does not necessarily mean that they have the best relationship with hip hop. The purpose of this paper is to examine women within the hip hop culture. More specifically, this paper is going to examine the unique relationship women have with hip hop. To achieve a better understanding of the unique relationshipRead MoreEssay about Radical Feminism and Hip Hop1550 Words   |  7 PagesSince its emergence in the South Bronx in the 1970’s, hip hop has spread to both urban and suburban communities throughout the world. Once an underground genre of music, it is seen in commercials, movies, television shows, etc. It has transformed from music and expanded into a full culture. It has even made its way into fashion and art. Men have always been on the front line of Hip Hop. However, the lyrics and images have changed tremendously. Lyrics and images that once spoke upon the injusticesRead MoreThe Music Industry And Mass Media2807 Words   |  12 Pagesmultiperspectival lens has an overall theme that women are objectified and mistreated in the music industry, especially in the hip-hop genre. In the readings and documentaries we have watched from class, there has been a common theme of mistreating women through music and this is important because it is becoming more and more acceptable in today’s society of accepting misogyny in music lyrics. The music industry and mass media confirms that being a woman in contemporary society means one needs toRead MoreAnalysis Of J. Cole s The Album 2014 Forest Hill Drive Essay1728 Words   |  7 Pagesbecame significant within the music industry because of how far it strays from the lyrical composition of popular rap artists of today. Majority of rap artists in the 2000’s rely heavily on commercial producers and multiple artist features to promote the popularity of their album. Rappers often do not stray far from crude, sexual and misogynistic lyrics just to gain fame and cash flow for their label. As a hip-hop artist, J. Cole manages to gain more success than any rap album with no features. J. ColeRead MoreWomen Of Hip Hop Culture Essay1723 Words   |  7 PagesWomen have decided to consume hip hop regardless of the sexism and machismo of their rap artist spouses. Historically, black women who have sex with other women haven’t been recognized in the Black community. Also, the expectations are the same in hip hop culture because men reject lesbians. An example is the murder in 2003 of Sakia Gunn after she declared her lesbian identity to a group of males. We all know that in hip hop culture men predominate and precisely masculine. Women can achieve a higherRead MorePop Hop And The Hip Hop2224 Words   |  9 Pagesladies in the hip-hop industry have to work extra hard to be seen as artist instead of just their sex. People that are involved in Hip-hop feminism in the industry draw on the strengths of both the feminist legacy and of the contemporary movement hip-hop. Hip-hop and black feminism have intertwined and evolved together to create its own self-identification and political sphere, that emphasizes the personal is the political, however, there is still a divide between women who embrace feminism, yet try toRead MoreThe Effect of Hip-Hop on Female AAE Speakers Essay1044 Words   |  5 Pagespopular RB/Hip-Hop songs in 2013. Because hip-hop is a very large part of the African American culture, and many speakers of African American English (AAE) are portrayed through these songs, women are often highly influenced by the objectification of their bodies in hip-hop songs. Since the emergence of the hip-hop genre in popular culture in the 1960s and 70s, w omen’s bodies have been sexually objectified through this music. Although the impact of the sexualization of women’s bodies in hip-hop songsRead MoreHistory Of Hip Hop And Influence On American Culture Essay1865 Words   |  8 PagesThe history of hip hop and the influence on American culture â€Å"Examples abound of hip hop permeating the entertainment world and beyond, from television and film, various musical genres, clothing styles, dance styles, marketing trends, the use of language, and more.† (Kitwana 109) Can something actually exist that undermines Middle American and family values threatening the assumed superior culture? There may just be such an inferior culture. This culture being hip-hop. Hip-hop, which originatedRead MoreBlack Women’s Role in Popular Culture: An Analysis of The Venus Hip Hop and the Pink Ghetto1155 Words   |  5 Pagesto world issues and politics. Music, movies, and literature have started cultural revolutions and challenged the straight-forward thinking many individuals have accepted in the past. But while popular culture can advance new ideas and create movements, it also has the ability to challenge advancements society has made. Imani Perry’s essay, The Venus Hip Hop and the Pink Ghetto, focuses on hip hop and its negative impact on women and body image. In The Venus Hip Hop and the Pink Ghetto, Imani Perry

America Land of Hypocrats Free Essays

string(156) " for her sexual favor because not only the male enjoys sex but the woman also gets sexual pleasures and the satisfaction of her own desires \(Hock, 2006\)\." Every aspect of the modern world has been wracked with scandals often involving many prominent personalities. Politicians, entertainers, athletes and socialites have been the target of many open accusations on wrong doings. More often than not, scandals or wrongdoings which are sexual in nature are the very ones that are discovered, spread and read in the papers. We will write a custom essay sample on America Land of Hypocrats or any similar topic only for you Order Now The private lives of individuals involved are laid open for public consumption as embarrassing sexual activities are investigated and ridiculed. They are usually the stories of people we read in the papers, hear being blamed and criticized on air, viewed and discussed amongst hosts and guests of television talk shows and the butt of jokes in common break-time conversations. The sexual behavior of famous people has become a huge part of entertainment as the media strives to outdo one another to give the most titillating and sexually adventurous background of a story. Throughout the decades, the sexual lives of prominent figures like politicians and rich businessmen who erred beyond their marital bed were often morally ridiculed. Their sexual escapades were told and retold to the next person aching to listen, and listeners came in droves ultimately hungry for a kill. The more famous the individual is, the bigger the likelihood of having his/her sexual activities discussed openly among ordinary individuals. We have seen many men exalted into political positions and fame getting involved with inappropriate sexual behavior. As their lives become public knowledge, they suffer invariable disgrace and have their reputations ruined forever. Political and military leaders are assumed to have an attitude possessing integrity as a quality that allows people, mostly his constituents and subordinates to grant him trust and respect commensurate to his public office and position. His favorable actions are considered above reproach and praised thus requiring him to conduct himself with dignity at all times. However, a single immoral deed when discovered and exposed could mark the end of his political career as his image becomes tarnished with relevant proof and negative criticisms. President Jefferson went down in the annals of history accused of maintaining a â€Å"Congo Harem† and fornicating with a slave, â€Å"Sally Hemmings† (Fitch, 2004:247). Likewise in a much publicized determination over the personal relationship between Monica Lewinsky and President Bill Clinton, another congressional inquiry morally questioned the sexual liaisons of Gary Condit and Chandra Levy (Fitch, 2004: 248). In the past, sexual behavior has been delegated to create a barometer for acceptable and non-acceptable sexual behavior and punishing it with public humiliation and loss of status (Apostolidis and Williams, 2004: 20). As an egalitarian society that fights to uphold a doctrine that strives to treat all men as equals, we are suddenly faced with the pressing question of accepting sexual behavior and relaxing our relentless probing of tawdry affairs between sexes regardless of affiliation within the realms of politics or seemingly allowing Victorian attitudes to morally judge a person. Considering the very nature of sexual scandals that wracked the nation has often been synonymously targeted against individuals whose relevant positions make them vulnerable to suppression and control by a higher force within the political system, are we not prone to maneuvers instead? Statement of the Problem In a ripe age of modernity amidst an age of sex scandals and political maneuvers and machinations, we are faced with the question over an understanding of human sexuality as a human nature and an acceptance of natural responses to consensual sexual behavior regardless of gender and identity. Purpose of the Study In the study of sexual scandals within the American politics, our aim is to explain normal sexual behavior and the natural human response. Political figures being humans themselves are definitely not averse to acts and deeds related to sex which is the subject of this study. In the understanding of human sexuality, this study will likewise explain how the natural human response have been brutally exposed and expanded to portray an overly unacceptable behavior particularly among prominent political figures as a motive for political party destruction and black propaganda. This study shall finally explain how collegiate students can exercise a modicum of understanding rather than moral ridicule over sexual behavior among people holding public office without necessarily promoting a relaxation of moral values among political leaders. Review of Related Literature The Human Natural Response to Sex Countless studies have supported that humans have a need for sex reconstructed and made clear in an unceasing receptivity that goes far beyond reproduction (Diamond, 1998: 67). For Diamond, the human biological function of sex is an evolutionary process that has created a continuing interest yet highly susceptible to predators (Diamond, 1998: 11). The National Institute of Health has also explained that in the understanding and acceptance of normal sexuality, sex should be understood as a vital part of life closer probably to the human need for pleasure and gratification (Calderone in NIH). Sex encompasses normal interactions among individuals where a sublime need for physical, emotional and sexual intimacy soon develops sometimes beyond the consideration of accepted norms in the society. This was likewise explained in the renowned works of Masters and Johnson, where the anatomical and physiological human responses to sex are directly dependent to a stimulus (Hock, 2006). Out of the pioneering efforts of authors Masters and Johnson, we begin to develop an understanding of how individuals may develop a wide variety of choices in their sexual encounters. The male specie as the known progenitor of sex in several social analyses may offer money, status and commitment in exchange for sex (Baumeister, 2001: 7). In this transaction, our common ideas have supported a conclusion that the woman is exploited by a man in the process which can be taken to indicate that men and women play different response to sex in the order of strength of sexual desire. Yet based on the theories and explanation of natural human response to sex, the woman actually gives up nothing in return for her sexual favor because not only the male enjoys sex but the woman also gets sexual pleasures and the satisfaction of her own desires (Hock, 2006). You read "America Land of Hypocrats" in category "Papers" In a sense with limited resource, we are however led to the belief that the woman’s capacity to command a higher price for sex becomes less with the increasing number of sexual partners by explaining the theory of rewards that, â€Å"where something is given out freely in the long run looses value† (Baumeister, 2001: 276). In the concept of homosexuality, we are led to believe on the perverse implications of homosexual behavior as a confusing role in the society. The complicated biological nature of sexuality however supports that humans express their sexuality in a variety of ways (Giddens, 2006:437). Theories explaining sexual responses also believed that homosexuality is not a choice that can allow one person to renounce homosexuality at the risk of giving up loving and being loved by another (Giddens, 2006:436). Where ideas about sexuality are undergoing magnified changes, we are confronted with recent trends of homosexuality within a continuing struggle against discrimination. Yet for many authors, the division and shaping of gender roles happens gradually as humans gain mastery of its environment (Diamond, 2006:122). Censure and Sexual Conservatism In countless years, the human sexual response has faced criticism as contingent biological facts faced ethical censure against American archaic obscenity laws. For many centuries, in the ethics of sexual conservatism, sex is permitted between a married couple (male and female) which only later permitted consensual sex among alternative marriage between same-sex partners (Apostolidis and Williams, 2004:149). Monogamous heterosexual marriage frowned upon premarital and extramarital while imposing the values of sexual exclusivity as a concept of good. Justifying sexual ethics soon became a sexual code conduct that undermines human frailty and weakness as part of man’s natural biological and psychological make-up (Baumeister, 2001: 281). Sexual Conservatism became a mode among older generations as forms of eroticism and homoerotic sex is shunned upon and evidently discouraged in order to protect the privacy of the individual in sustaining social order (Davis, 1996:59). A New Understanding on Human Sexuality In the last forty years or so, we have moved from an idealistic view of human nature by relaxing appealing views on sexual freedom and understanding. The 60’s created for us a period of experimentation on freedom of human sexual response topped with socialistic problems of single motherhood that began to disprove sexual censorships of the past centuries and decades (Fitch, 2004: 92). In an attempt to create order in a society, the punitive forces against sexual behaviors became relaxed and tolerant. Sexual ethics to a degree became understood as something which is variable, depending on the changes in human nature and changes in the human society (Diamond, 2006: 95). Open discussions on sexuality soon became a positive issue in an integral point of discussion on the promotion of responsible sexual behaviors. Expanded research on the topic opened dialogues and strategies to promote an awareness f sexual behavior. Homosexuality was removed from a list of mental disorders thereby paving the way for an enhanced understanding of health in the context of homosexuality (WHO, 2007). Politicians: Common Targets Sex has continued to permeate as a permanent fixture in the United States political arena. If we consider the well-publicized scandals at the early days of the republic, we can substantially agree that media freedom contributed well to our knowledge. This is a price politicians have to pay for living within the limelight of press freedom (Apostolidis and Williams, 2004: 7). From Jefferson’s sexual affairs, Kennedy’s sexual indulgences and Clinton’s sexual adventures, public officials have notoriously strayed beyond the bounds of sexual propriety (Apostolidis and Williams, 2004: 7). These scandals are discussed to investigate an abuse of power and influence to some extent but more commonly, America’s desire to talk about it spins the essential reason for its being. Politicians are easy targets in a discourse that stages the regulatory practice of powerful men. Betsy Wright, (a Clinton campaign chair) once said that enormous amounts of money was on the streets as tabloid newspapers and televisions were looking for a Clinton mistress ready to tell all whom they could pay off (Shields, Whayne and Kelley, 2004: 30). Although the law often exercises a general presumption of innocence especially on gossips involving sex and politics, other political rivals demand for an eruption to be told. Their lives are placed in public scrutiny while media created a salacious story while the public decide. To protect their position, politicians in turn exercise control by bringing in the big guns for a major cover-up that could exonerate them from the accusation. Such collusion within the government and media in an attempt to break free from a sex scandal may or may not change public sentiment. The socially injured politician could be likely subjected to blackmail as the public’s interest in their personal details catches attention. Analysis Within a political rubric, a sex scandal issue questions the morality of an individual thereby accusing him of misconduct and wrongdoing. Investigating the nature of a sex act, much fuss has been delegated over a sexual scandal despite the fact that the human sexuality has explained how the sexual aspect of human nature does not conform to solitude and celibate life. Humans have a clear need for sex that ultimately goes far beyond reproduction (Diamond, 1998: 67). This mindless act is understood as a vital part of life as scientific studies proved naturally how human responses are dependent on stimulus and how one works for self-gratification in Freudian principles. In a male-female relationship, the woman is seen as the giver of sex while man, as the taker. In a much diverse and modern understanding of sexuality, theories explaining sexual responses understand and accept that homosexuality is not a choice but simply an alternative means to find love and intimacy (Giddens, 2006:436). The above ideas magnify the societal changes that have provided a deeper understanding of the human sexual response in a world where sexual roles change depending upon human mastery. Criticisms that sought to break free from an understanding of human sexual response support an American archaic obscenity law that condones sex between married couples alone. A code of conduct is invisibly used to castigate those sexual encounters that go beyond the accepted â€Å"married couple† standard including homoeroticism and auto eroticism perhaps. It is quite clear that America despite claiming egalitarianism still borders on Victorian conservatism that has often been an issue of â€Å"double standard†. The rich technology and passage into modernity has paved way for a modern view on the subject yet where sexual lives of political leaders are discussed. Such ironies are encountered when America’s social make-up demands salacious discussion on erotic escapades of public personalities and political figures. Such indecent behaviors are held out in the open like a frosting on a highly palatable cake while the public greedily eyes it. The sexual aspect of human nature is terribly disregarded in an effort to point fingers to the sexual perpetrator. In campaign attacks, sexual stories are blown up to portray an animalistic behavior inherent in rival political figures in order to tarnish his character and respectability. The fuss over sex scandals only serve to portray how America has a limited understanding on human sexuality and despite the presence of numerous books, journals and online resources that strive to explain it. Conclusion Our problem strives to answer whether we are in a ripe age of modernity to understand sex scandals in the face of political maneuvers and machinations while relying on the scientific principles of human nature’s response to sexual behavior regardless of gender and identity. America, I believe is steadily approaching and understanding of political maneuvers and machinations as we are suddenly faced with numerous allegations of illicit sexual activities. The past few decades have allowed us to display a relaxed attitude towards sex as schools and universities strive to impart a better understanding of the subject. Where prominent political figures are concerned however, the American public is deeply dependent on the media and is often quick to point a finger to a perpetrator of prominence. Politicians have received public ridicule over gossips despite the fact that American law exercises a general presumption of innocence especially on gossips involving sex and politics. The American sentiment against sexual wrongdoings still border on Victorian ideas and there is an apparent need for social reform within this context. The human nature and understanding of the wrong doer is stripped indiscriminately applied over in politics in the face of an American public quick to cast a finger without further ado. Recommendations We do not strive to suggest the political and moral responsibility of individuals in public office but rather dwell on an understanding of sexual behavior of men. We strive to impart the knowledge that America needs to understand the basics of human sexuality before it can gain foothold on a publicized discussion of political sexual scandals. Not only do we uphold media responsibility but strive to insist on legitimacy and credibility of media coverage in sex scandal cases among accused public officials. It has been commonplace for sex scandal issues to be used against a candidate during campaigns. Such attacks and mudslinging has been associated with an election strategy launched against a potential rival and in the end portray American ignorance. Nor do we support that evidence against sexual scandals be stonewalled, concealed and obstructed. Our main aim is merely to procure an understanding of human sexuality as a human nature and an acceptance of natural responses to consensual sexual behavior regardless of gender and identity. There is also a need for America to exercise a deeper understanding of human sexuality. I believe that in fact there is a boiling need for reform on generalized views that should be the basis for a future study. Reference Apostolidis, Paul and Williams, Juliet. 2004. Public Affairs: Politics in the Age of Sex Scandals. Duke University. Baumeister, Roy F. (2001). Social Psychology and Human Sexuality: Essential Readings. Psychology Press. Davis, Peter. (1996). Intimate Details and Vital Statistic: AIDS, Sexuality and the Social Order in New Zealand. Auckland University. Diamond, Jared. (1998). Why Sex is Fun? : The Evolution of Human Sexuality. New York: Basic Books. Fitch, Brad. (2004). Media Relations Handbook for Agencies, Associations, Nonprofits, and Congress. The Capitol. Giddens, Anthony. (2006). Sociology. Polity. Hock, Roger R. (2006). Human Sexuality. US: Prentice Hall. Shields, Todd, Whayne, Jeannie, Kelley, Donald R. (2004). The Clinton Riddle: Perspectives on the Forty-second President. University of Arkansas. United States. National Institute on Health. Calderone, Mary Steichen. (2003). Human Sexuality. [handouts] United Nations. World Health Organization. (2007). Human Rights Mechanisms: putting women’s health on the agenda, Lesbian and Bisexual Women’s Health: Common Concerns, Local Issues. [handouts]. How to cite America Land of Hypocrats, Papers

Political Parties Essays (1221 words) - Elections,

Political Parties Since the last of the Whig party left office in 1852, the American political system has been primarily a two party system. The Democrats and the Republicans have been the two parties fighting for the Presidency since that time. There have been many other parties since that time, but mainly, these two have gone unopposed against each other. However, how much good do these parties actually do? Would our country be run as effectively if the presence of political parties was no longer a factor? It is the opinion of the authors that the U.S. Government would exist without political parties and may, in fact be stronger. The concept of political parties seems to go against what it means to be a politician: to represent his or her constituents. More time, money and effort, it seems is put into getting elected to an office than actually doing work for the people in that office. One fairly recent example is seen in the case of the proposed federal Balanced Budget Amendment. Mark Hatfield, Republican Oregon Senator, went against his parties wishes and voted against the amendment. His party nearly abandoned him for choosing the people over his party. Many senators are faced with the same decision every day, but instead stick with party beliefs and not what they feel would be the best for the people. In order for true democracy to be achieved in our government, we feel drastic changes need to occur. Review Of The Literature Since the mid 1850's, the Democrats and Republicans have had control of the nation government. The only place where opposition was felt was at the state and local levels. However, in the early days of our country, third and fourth party candidates played important roles in politics. A few of these parties from our history are the: Democrat-Republicans, Jefferson Republicans, Whigs and Federalists. Many other lesser known or hardly known at all parties were the: Socialists, Unionists, Farmer-Laborists, Progressives, Communists, States' Rights, American Independents, Libertarians, New Alliance, Populists, Consumers, National Economic Recovery, Right to Life, Workers league, Socialist Workers, Peace and Freedom, Prohibitionists, Workers World, American, Grassroots, Independent and Third World Assembly. This immense list goes to show that not all American history has been two party. What we know today as Democrats and Republicans derived from some of these parties to be what they are today. The emergence of the parties has come mainly as a reaction to history where most of the rulers have been dictators or kings. The people do not favor dictatorship and therefore created political parties to better represent the feelings of the voters (Madron, 1974). This is not a time of a dictatorship and we have achieved representative democracy. We have evolved as a nation and have grown out of the need for political parties. The 1992 Presidential election was a definite sign that the usefulness of political parties is crumbling. The Democrats came out on top, followed by the Republicans, however, a third party candidate, Ross Perot, emerged and ended the race with nearly 10,000,000 popular votes. Perot made himself out to be the only one who could clean up the mess in Washington, and came through with an impressive finish (Wolfson, 1994). From this example, it is obvious that the way we know political parties, or perhaps political parties as a whole, are being phased out by the people. The world in which we live is constantly changing and getting faster and more efficient at making news readily available to the people. Back in the times before radio, tv, the internet and e-mail, people had to find out somehow about politics. The main source of their information came from political parties to educate them as to who was running and what they stood for and believed in (Carlin, 1992). Now, if someone needs information on some kind of politics, they can simply turn on C-Span, surf the ever-expanding net, or write an e-mail to the President himself. Another strike against political parties is evident. Lately, politicians have had their way in separating themselves from the voters whom they are supposed to represent. A greater gap is growing between the two. Voters do not like being just a number (Wolfson, 1994). The basis of democracy, in case some have forgotten, is equal representation for all people. By separating themselves from the voters, politicians are only creating a stronger case against political parties. Another such argument against parties can be seen in the fact that lately, voters have been straying from voting for one candidate. Instead